LLMs have changed the amount of technical research an experienced pentester can realistically perform in the time available for a security assessment. Patch analysis, code review, debugging and proof-of-concept development can now be approached more efficiently, making focused 1-day research increasingly practical during ordinary engagements.
Attackers have access to these capabilities too. Our job is to assess what a capable attacker could actually achieve, including exploitation paths that automated scanning and conventional testing may miss.
Efficiency matters for two reasons: it leaves more time to investigate complex weaknesses and makes it possible to cover more of the attack surface. The value goes to the client through deeper research and broader coverage.
None of this removes the need for technical expertise. The researcher's experience, judgment and persistence still determine which leads are worth pursuing and whether a hypothesis survives testing.